As unbelievable as it sounds, the United Nations is trying to organize United States police departments into one big global police force. Actually it isn’t as difficult to believe as it seems because the United Nations is a front for the New World Order. The United Nations is directed, in large part, by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which enforces sharia law. The OIC represents approximately 25% of the world’s population, whereas the United States has 5% of the world’s population.
Step one in the takeover is the federal government taking over police departments throughout the country. This is currently being done with consent decrees. It has already been implemented in numerous cities, including Miami, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Ferguson, Missouri.
The federal government takeover of police departments is the result of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act. This Act allows the Department of Justice to file a federal lawsuit against a jurisdiction, such as a city, and claim constitutional and/or civil rights violations were committed by the police. Then, the city would agree, without contest, to the finding of the judge, and severe regulations are imposed on the police by a federal court order. The court order may include requirements for conducting searches, what legal use of force means, and numerous other regulations that must be complied with. The compliance aspect lasts for years and includes federal reviews, deadlines for implementation, and gives the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division jurisdiction over local police.
An example of how this happens in the United States is the consent decree that Newark, New Jersey, signed with the Justice Department in March 2016.
The original complaint claimed that the Police Department of Newark (NPD) “has engaged in a pattern or practice of constitutional violations in its stop and arrest practices, responses to individuals’ exercise of their rights under the First Amendment, uses of force, and theft by officers. The investigation also revealed that the pattern or practice of constitutional violations stems in part from deficiencies in NPD’s systems that are designed to prevent and detect misconduct, including its systems for reviewing force and investigating complaints regarding officer conduct.”
When the city of Newark signed the consent decree, it meant the city agreed to the allegations in the decree and would implement “comprehensive and agency-wide policies and procedures that are consistent with and incorporate all substantive requirements of this agreement.” Some of the procedures implemented involved making stops, conducting searches, and using force. Two years have been given for implementation, and the agreement will be in effect for five years. This will affect more than one mayoral administration in Newark since they typically last four years, and a new mayor could not change the agreement in any way.
There have never been congressional hearings about the nationalization of police departments by Obama (BB).
Consent decrees are now being used in other fedeal departments, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As a result of a 2009 decree against Westchester County, New York, all cities and counties nationwide that accept community development block grants must observe HUD’s zoning requirements.
On October 2, 2015, Attorney General Loretta Lynch (CFR) said that the Strong Cities Network (SCN) would be created by her office in cities nationwide. The SCN is a United Nations law enforcement program that will be implemented worldwide. Lynch made the announcement at the United Nations, not at a location that was part of the federal government.
This is treason because it supplants the Constitution of the United States with laws of the United Nations. According to Article VI of the Constitution of the United States:
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
Days before Lynch’s statement, a press release was distributed that announced the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” The press release contained this statement, “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.” This statement creates the precedent for the federal government and/or United Nations to interfere in local jurisdictions.
Lynch suggested that national sovereignty is irrelevant when she said, “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.” Nearly all “domestic and global terror threats” are planned and carried out by governments worldwide.
A dictionary definition of treason is “acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.” Lynch is all too familiar with treason because she is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. The director of the CFR, Richard Haass, has said, “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.” Globalization’s goal of a one world government, a New World Order, cannot exist unless all national sovereignty throughout the world has been destroyed.
The press release also contained a statement from a Strong Cities Network participant, Governing Mayor Stian Berger Røsland of Oslo, Norway. The mayor said, “To counter violent extremism we need determined action at all levels of governance. To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society.” Hasn’t terrorism and extremism been one of the only areas that countries have cooperated in fighting against?
An International Steering Committee, comprised of local authorities from cities in different regions worldwide, will direct the Strong Cities Network.
Where is Congress? Are we supposed to believe they aren’t aware of the Strong Cities Network? Do they think it’s okay that the attorney general of the United States has committed treason? They may not have a problem with Lynch’s actions, since a surprising number of them are also CFR members.
In June 2016, the United Nations held the initial UN “Chiefs of Police Summit” (UN COPS) meeting. It consisted of more than 100 national police chiefs, and comes approximately two years following Secretary-General of the Un Ban Ki-moon’s statement that United States police forces needed to comply with “international standards.”
Apparently the summit meeting was a ploy for more money. According to a UN commissioned report, “In reality, the [UN] Police Division’s current capacity and resourcing is insufficient and has not kept pace with the increased tasks and complexity of police mandates in peace operations.” The report included numerous recommendations, including increasing the number of UN police officers, as well as implementing a “strategic framework” that would have UN police being a “substitute for local police,” “helping secure elections,” and even fighting “crime and violent extremism.” The UN police also need “the latest technology and access to intelligence.”
At the summit, Ban described what the UN officers do in the worldwide “peace” missions. “They protect communities. They bring stability. They restore confidence. UN COPS is a tremendous opportunity. It is a chance to further ensure that United Nations Police become ever more ‘fit for purpose’ — and able to meet the security threats in today’s volatile global context. Together, let us work for a safer and more secure world for all. United Nations Police are your police.” Ban then added. “This important forum provides a unique opportunity to promote the links between UN policing and national police services and to learn from different policing approaches.” Uhhhhh, no thanks.
In reality, based on past incidents the UN “police” officers assigned to 18 different UN “peace” missions worldwide have been involved in, more officers sounds like a bad thing.
The UN website lists several areas the Police Division currently works in. One of the areas states, “Response to Sexual and Gender-based Violence (SGBV): Strengthening its response to sexual and gender-based violence and is creating guidance to assist its police officers.” Apparently the officers think they are there to cause sexual violence, not prevent it.
During the past several decades, there have been documented reports of what occurs on some of the “peace missions.” Reports of horrific violence committed by peace keepers have included eight-year old children raped in Haiti and other locations; supporting Muslim militias murdering Christians in Africa; moving child sex slaves off the Balkan Peninsula; and killing medical workers and civilians in the Congo. Since the listed incidents of violence date back to the 1960’s, the problem may be systemic.
UN Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson also spoke at the summit and said, “UN Police are our police, serving ‘We the Peoples’ of the UN. We commend your commitment to work with the UN to advance peace and security as one international community and one global neighborhood.” Hmmm . . . how do sovereign nations fit into “one international community and one global neighborhood?” Eliasson also said, “strongly linked to all these efforts is the transformative 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Actually Agenda 2030 is the global totalitarianism of complete collapse into the New World Order. Agenda 2030 has been signed by Obama of course, but the U. S. Senate has not ratified it.
There have been reports that more than 500 UN election monitors will be monitoring the November 2016 election. There have also been numerous sightings of UN vehicles across the country, and various explanations for the vehicles being in the United States, for several years.
How is the United Nations Funded?
Funding for the United Nations comes from the member countries. There are 193 member nations, and each country’s contribution amount is assessed every three years. Currently, less than 0.1% each is contributed by 136 countries, which adds up to less than 15% of the total budget. More than 1% each is contributed by 17 countries, which is approximately 85% of the total budget. The United States, of course, contributes the most at 22% of the “regular” budget, and 28.36% for the peacekeeing budget. In 2010, the last year the U. S. contribution was calculated, the United States contributed $7.6 billion, but that was considered to be a conservative estimate. The country that contributes the next highest amount of the regular budget is Japan, at approximately 10.8%.
Should the United States be a member of an organization that is anti-American and frequently drags the U. S. into wars that do not involve the interests of the United States?
In 2015, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL), introduced the American Sovereignty Restoration Act into Congress. This bill would withdraw the U. S. from the United Nations, its suborganizations, any military campaigns, and no longer recognize diplomatic immunity for UN delegates and their employees.
Contact your Senators and Representatives and tell them to pass this legislation immediately.